EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF MACHINE-LEARNING-BASED COMPLIANCE SCORING MODELS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES EXCISE TAXPAYER IN INDONESIA WITH INNOVATIVE ENCODING STRATEGY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jmua.15.4.495-505.2026

Keywords:

Catboost, Ordered Target Encoding, Weight of Evidence

Abstract

The transformation of categorical variables as part of the feature engineering process is a critical stage in classification modeling because it determines the quality of the information representation used throughout model development. This issue is particularly relevant to the development of a compliance scoring model for excise taxpayers producing or importing alcoholic beverages in Indonesia, where all predictor variables are categorical. The compliance scoring model currently implemented by the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE) is based on a manually constructed scorecard in which the categorization of predictor variables is determined subjectively. Moreover, the existing model has not been empirically validated to represent the probability of compliance violations. This study aims to evaluate the current excise compliance scoring model while developing data-driven alternatives using logistic regression and the Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) algorithm with innovative categorical encoding strategies. Two encoding methods are compared: Weight of Evidence (WoE), representing a conventional statistical approach, and Ordered Target (OT), which is adapted from the CatBoost encoding mechanism. All models are validated using repeated k-fold cross-validation and evaluated based on the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC), the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) statistic, and several additional performance metrics. The results demonstrate that OT encoding consistently outperforms WoE across all logistic regression scenarios, increasing the KS statistic from 0.27 for the existing compliance scoring model to 0.34 with WoE and 0.42 with OT. Furthermore, the CatBoost model achieves superior predictive performance compared with both logistic regression models (AUC = 0.715; KS = 0.471), indicating stronger discriminative ability in identifying compliance violations. These findings demonstrate that integrating target-based encoding with boosting algorithms produces a more adaptive and accurate compliance scoring model, providing a robust analytical framework to support risk-based excise supervision in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Williem, C. A., & Julitawaty, W. (2024). Peran kebijakan ekstensifikasi cukai dalam melindungi kesehatan masyarakat. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Perpajakan dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59407/jakpt.v1i3.579

[2] Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai. (2024). Instruksi Nomor INS-3/BC/2024 tentang Profil Risiko Pengusaha Barang Kena Cukai dalam Rangka Pengawasan dan Pelayanan di Bidang Cukai. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.

[3] Margeloiu, A. (2025). Tabular Machine Learning on Small-Size and High-Dimensional Data. University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.117151

[4] Chen, K., Zhu, K., Meng, Y., Yadav, A., & Khan, A. (2019). Mixed credit scoring model of logistic regression and evidence weight in the background of big data. In J. Xu, M. Gen, & F. L. Cooke (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 866, pp. 335–345). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16657-1_40

[5] Siddiqi, N. (2006). Credit risk scorecards: Developing and implementing intelligent credit scoring. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[6] Duong, B. T., Sariyev, O., & Zeller, M. (2025). Can Weight of Evidence Method Improve Poverty Targeting? Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03576-z

[7] Pomazanov, M. (2023). Continuous transformation of nonmonotonic factors of the scoring model increasing its discriminating power. Procedia Computer Science, 221, 237–244.

[8] Hancock, J. T., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2020). CatBoost for Big Data: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Big Data, 7(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00369-8

[9] Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A. V., & Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09516

[10] Biarnes, A. (2021). How CatBoost encodes categorical variables? Medium. https://medium.com/data-science/how-catboost-encodes-categorical-variables-3866fb2ae640

[11] Chen, H., & Xiang, Y. (2017). The study of credit scoring model based on group lasso. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.423

[12] James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2023). An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R and Python (3rd ed.). Springer.

[13] Persson, R. (2021). Weight of evidence transformation in credit scoring models: How does it affect the discriminatory power? [Master’s thesis, Lund University, Department of Statistics]. LUP Student Papers. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9066332

[14] Kritzinger, N. & Van Vuuren, G.W. (2018). An optimised credit scorecard to enhance cut-off score determination. South African Journal of Economic and ManagementSciences 21(1).https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1571

[15] Abellana, D. P. M., & Lao, D. M. M. (2023). A new univariate feature selection algorithm based on the best–worst multi-attribute decision-making method. Decision Analytics Journal, 7, 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100240

Downloads

Published

20-10-2026

How to Cite

Riansyah, B., Sartono, B., & Afendi, F. M. (2026). EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF MACHINE-LEARNING-BASED COMPLIANCE SCORING MODELS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES EXCISE TAXPAYER IN INDONESIA WITH INNOVATIVE ENCODING STRATEGY. Jurnal Matematika UNAND, 15(4), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.25077/jmua.15.4.495-505.2026

Issue

Section

Articles